
Are Sweepstakes Casinos Legal? A State-by-State Guide
Are sweepstakes casinos legal in your state? Explore our 2026 state-by-state guide to key laws, restrictions, and what players need to know.
Are Sweepstakes Casinos Legal? A State-by-State Guide
Sweepstakes casinos are legal in most of the United States. State sweepstakes law and consumer-protection law govern the model, and no gaming licence applies to it. That single distinction decides the answer in every state.
Published legal trackers counted 12 states with a statutory ban on online sweepstakes casinos in September 2026, and 11 of those bans already apply. Three further states, such as Washington and Michigan, block the model through regulator action instead of a statute. Your own platform matters too, because operator availability and state legality are separate lists.
This guide gives the legal test, the full state table with bill numbers and effective dates, and Betzy's own published position. It is not legal advice.
Are Sweepstakes Casinos Legal?
Yes in most of the country, and no in a growing minority of states. The model stays lawful wherever a promotional sweepstakes stays lawful. A legislature or a regulator makes it unlawful by naming the dual-currency structure inside the gambling code.
Eleven of the 12 statutory bans arrived inside two years, so the sweepstakes casino legal states list moves often. No state has created a licence for the model, which means legality here describes an exemption that holds rather than an approval a regulator grants.
Status as of September 2026 | Count | States |
Statutory ban in force | 11 | California, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee |
Statutory ban enacted, not yet in force | 1 | Oklahoma, from 1 November 2026 |
Blocked by regulator action, no dedicated statute | 3 | Idaho, Michigan, Washington |
Ban bill filed and pending | 3 + DC | Maryland, Minnesota, Virginia, District of Columbia |
No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | 32 | Listed in full below |
Betzy's own restricted list, Terms section 3.2 | 3 + 1 | No access: Washington, Idaho, Nevada. Play permitted, no prize claim: Michigan |
Are Sweepstakes Casinos Gambling? The 3-Part Legal Test
US law treats an activity as gambling when three elements appear together. A sweepstakes removes one of them on purpose, which places sweepstakes casinos outside the gambling statute in most states. Three elements decide it, and the first one carries the whole question.
Consideration. You pay something to take part. This is the element a sweepstakes removes, by keeping the prize-bearing currency obtainable without payment.
Chance. The outcome is decided randomly rather than by skill. A sweepstakes keeps this element.
Prize. You can win something of value. A sweepstakes keeps this element too, which is why the free route has to be genuine.
Why Sweepstakes Casinos Are Lawful Where They Are
Three features carry the argument, and all three must hold at once. The free route has to match any paid route in every respect that affects winning. The redeemable currency has to reach the player free, which means the platform gives Sweeps Coins and sells only Gold Coins.
Betzy states the equality point in section 8.1 of its Terms. Gold Coin purchases stay entirely optional, provide no gameplay advantage, and players who use only the free entry methods hold the same chance of winning as players who buy Gold Coin packages. That sentence carries the exemption.
The free routes therefore sit in the Terms rather than in a campaign. Betzy publishes five of them, such as the daily login bonus and the mail-in request, and how to get free Sweeps Coins sets out each one. The end-to-end mechanics sit in how sweepstakes casinos work.
What States That Ban Sweepstakes Casinos Decided Instead
The banning states do not dispute the three-part test. Each legislature moves the model out of reach of the exemption instead, usually by naming the dual-currency structure inside the gambling statute. A platform that offers Gold Coins alongside Sweeps Coins then meets that state's definition of gambling.
California's AB 831 shows the pattern clearly. The statute names dual-currency and social casinos, and it attaches criminal exposure to operators and to the affiliates who promote them. Marketing partners left California alongside the platforms for that reason.
A statute of that kind ends the argument inside its state rather than testing it in court. The sweepstakes casino states map now moves by legislation, not by ruling.
Which States Allow Sweepstakes Casinos, and Which Ban Them?
Three tables below cover every state that restricts the model. Published legal trackers and law-firm commentary supply every assignment, and the data describes online sweepstakes casinos as a category rather than any one platform. Social casinos that award no prize sit outside these tables, because no redeemable currency exists there to regulate.
Trackers disagree at the margins, particularly where a regulator acts without a statute. Treat each assignment as a September 2026 snapshot to verify.
Three buckets hold every restricted state: 12 with a statute, 3 blocked by a regulator, and 3 plus the District of Columbia with a bill pending. The remaining 32 states carry no ban at all, and the alphabetical lookup in the next section names each of them rather than repeating them here.
Sweepstakes Casino Banned States With a Statutory Ban
Twelve states have written the dual-currency model out of their law. Eleven of those bans already apply. Oklahoma passed its ban over a veto, and the prohibition begins on 1 November 2026.
State | Bill | Effective | What it does |
New Jersey | A5447 | 15 August 2025 | Took effect on signature and prohibits dual-currency sweepstakes play |
Montana | SB 555 | 1 October 2025 | Classifies unauthorised online promotional and sweepstakes gaming under the state gambling code |
Connecticut | SB 1235 | 1 October 2025 | Enacts sweepstakes gaming language alongside regulator enforcement |
Nevada | SB 256 | 1 October 2025 | Bans dual-currency sweepstakes and online promotional gaming |
New York | S5935A | 5 December 2025 | Prohibits sweepstakes casino mechanics by statute |
California | AB 831 | 1 January 2026 | Outlaws dual-currency and social casinos, with criminal penalties for operators and affiliates |
Indiana | HB 1052 | 1 July 2026 | Bans sweepstakes gaming offered online or on mobile through a dual-currency system |
Iowa | SF 2289 | 1 July 2026, signed 15 May 2026 | Expands state enforcement authority over promotional sweepstakes gaming |
Maine | LD 2007 | 14 July 2026 | Prohibits dual-currency promotional models, 90 days after signature |
Louisiana | HB 53 (Act 48) and HB 883 (Act 182) | 1 August 2026 | Bans sweepstakes casino operation and reaches the conduct under racketeering provisions |
Tennessee | HB 1885 / SB 2136 | Signed 22 May 2026 | Bans dual-currency play and widens attorney-general enforcement powers |
Oklahoma | SB 1589 | 1 November 2026, not yet in force | Passed over a veto; the prohibition starts on the effective date |
Sweepstakes Casino States Blocked by a Regulator, Not a Statute
Three states keep sweepstakes casinos out without a sweepstakes-specific statute. Each uses an existing instrument instead, such as commission guidance or a cease-and-desist letter. They sit outside the legislative count above and on almost every operator's exclusion list.
State | Mechanism | Practical effect |
Washington | Gambling Commission guidance under a long-standing ban on online casino-style play | Regulators treat the model as illegal online gambling, and operators exclude the state outright |
Idaho | State statutory and constitutional framework covering prize play | The state bars real-prize sweeps, so only non-redeemable play remains viable |
Michigan | Gaming Control Board cease-and-desist enforcement | The regulator pursues operators directly, and several restrict the prize claim, the play, or both |
Sweepstakes Casino States With a Ban Bill Pending
Three states carry a 2026 ban bill that legislators filed and have not resolved, such as Maryland, Minnesota and Virginia. The District of Columbia adds B26-0656, the Internet Gaming and Consumer Protection Act of 2026, which reached the Council on 9 April 2026.
These four jurisdictions are the likeliest additions to the banned column on current evidence. An operator may also pull out of any of them before a vote, which is how a sweepstakes casino becomes unavailable while the law stays unchanged.
All 50 Sweepstakes Casino States and DC at a Glance
The three tables above group states by how they restrict the model. This one does the opposite: it lists every state alphabetically, so you find your own in a single row.
The middle column gives the market status published trackers reported in September 2026. The right column gives Betzy's own position from section 3.2 of its Terms.
The two columns answer different questions. A state can permit the model while an operator still excludes it, and a state can ban the model while an operator's published list has not caught up.
State | Market status, September 2026 | Betzy, per Terms section 3.2 |
Alabama (AL) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Alaska (AK) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Arizona (AZ) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Arkansas (AR) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
California (CA) | Ban in force, AB 831, 1 Jan 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Colorado (CO) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Connecticut (CT) | Ban in force, SB 1235, 1 Oct 2025 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Delaware (DE) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
District of Columbia (DC) | No ban, B26-0656 pending since 9 Apr 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2 |
Florida (FL) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Georgia (GA) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Hawaii (HI) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Idaho (ID) | Blocked by regulator action, no statute | No access |
Illinois (IL) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Indiana (IN) | Ban in force, HB 1052, 1 Jul 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Iowa (IA) | Ban in force, SF 2289, 1 Jul 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Kansas (KS) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Kentucky (KY) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Louisiana (LA) | Ban in force, HB 53 (Act 48) / HB 883 (Act 182), 1 Aug 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Maine (ME) | Ban in force, LD 2007, 14 Jul 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Maryland (MD) | No ban, 2026 ban bill pending | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Massachusetts (MA) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Michigan (MI) | Blocked by regulator action, no statute | Play permitted, no prize claim |
Minnesota (MN) | No ban, 2026 ban bill pending | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Mississippi (MS) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Missouri (MO) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Montana (MT) | Ban in force, SB 555, 1 Oct 2025 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Nebraska (NE) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Nevada (NV) | Ban in force, SB 256, 1 Oct 2025 | No access |
New Hampshire (NH) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
New Jersey (NJ) | Ban in force, A5447, 15 Aug 2025 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
New Mexico (NM) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
New York (NY) | Ban in force, S5935A, 5 Dec 2025 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
North Carolina (NC) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
North Dakota (ND) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Ohio (OH) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Oklahoma (OK) | Ban from 1 Nov 2026, SB 1589, 1 Nov 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Oregon (OR) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Pennsylvania (PA) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Rhode Island (RI) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
South Carolina (SC) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
South Dakota (SD) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Tennessee (TN) | Ban in force, HB 1885 / SB 2136, signed 22 May 2026 | Not named in Terms 3.2; state law bans the model |
Texas (TX) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Utah (UT) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Vermont (VT) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Virginia (VA) | No ban, 2026 ban bill pending | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Washington (WA) | Blocked by regulator action, no statute | No access |
West Virginia (WV) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Wisconsin (WI) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Wyoming (WY) | No ban, no enforcement posture, no pending bill | Available per Terms 3.2 |
Counts reconcile as 12 statutory bans, 3 regulator-blocked states, 3 states plus the District of Columbia with a bill pending, and 32 states clear. Betzy names 4 of them in its Terms, such as Washington and Michigan, and states that it may update the list at any time.
How to Read a Sweepstakes Casino State Table: 5 Cautions
A sweepstakes casino states map dates faster than anything else written about the category. Readers misread it in five predictable ways, and each one changes the practical answer.
Absence of a ban is not approval. A state with no sweepstakes-specific statute may still have broad gambling statutes that have never been tested against the dual-currency model.
The count is a snapshot. Eleven of the twelve statutory bans arrived inside two years and four more jurisdictions have bills live now.
Trackers disagree. Some count Nevada, Washington and Idaho as long-standing exclusions rather than recent additions, which moves the headline number by two or three.
A ban can block play, redemption, or both. Michigan is the standing example of a state where play continues and the prize claim does not.
State availability is not operator availability. The operator's own restricted list is the one that decides whether an account can exist.
Is Betzy Legal in My State? Where Betzy Is Available
Betzy publishes its own availability in section 3.2 of its Terms and Conditions, version 1.0, effective 5 June 2026 and read on 15 September 2026. That clause governs a Betzy account, and no third-party map replaces it.
Residents of Washington, Idaho and Nevada may not use the platform in any capacity. Michigan residents may play with Gold Coins or Sweeps Coins across the lobby, such as Sweeps Coins slots and live dealer tables, and they cannot redeem Sweeps Coins for prizes. The clause also states that Betzy may restrict additional states and may update the list at any time as laws change.
Scope | No access | Play permitted, prize claim blocked | Everywhere else |
Betzy, per Terms section 3.2 (v1.0, effective 5 June 2026) | Washington, Idaho, Nevada | Michigan | Available, with the list subject to change at any time |
Broader market, per third-party trackers, September 2026 | 12 statutory bans, one effective 1 November 2026, plus 3 regulator-blocked states | Varies by operator | 32 states with no ban, no enforcement posture and no pending bill |
Some states appear in the market row and not in Betzy's clause. The Terms still control the account in those states, and Betzy may update the published list to match the law. Check the live position at state availability rather than any guide.
Betzy also plans an update for players in other restricted jurisdictions. The upcoming release will add Gold Coin-only play, allowing social games such as classic slots for entertainment without prize redemptions. That feature remains in active development and is not yet available on the site.
Section 13 of the same Terms lists two related prohibitions. Playing while located in a restricted territory breaches it, and so does using a VPN, a proxy or other anonymising technology to get around geo-restrictions. Stated consequences include account suspension, forfeiture of balances and loss of pending redemptions.
Why One Operator's Sweepstakes Casino States Differ From Another's
Two platforms can run an identical model and serve a different set of states. Corporate risk explains the gap, not the law. An operator may self-restrict a state with no ban at all, pulling out ahead of a pending bill or after an attorney-general letter.
That practice produces different answers at every brand for a single-state query, such as sweepstakes casino California. A state's absence from one platform's restricted list tells you nothing about that state's view of sweepstakes casinos. Read an operator map as that operator's risk position, never as the national legal position.
Can a Player Be Prosecuted for Using a Sweepstakes Casino?
The tables above answer where the model is banned. They do not answer the question most readers in those states actually have, which is what a ban means for them personally.
No, on the evidence available. Every 2025 and 2026 statute reviewed for this guide penalises the operator and the businesses that support it, not the person who plays.
California's AB 831 shows the pattern. The statute makes a violation a misdemeanor, with a fine of $1,000 to $25,000, up to a year in county jail, or both. It reaches operators and any entity that knowingly supports them, such as payment processors, geolocation providers, gaming content suppliers and media affiliates.
Published analysis of the bill records that it does not penalise the California residents who played before the ban. The other 2026 bans read the same way. Louisiana's HB 883 lists operators, platform providers, suppliers, geolocation providers, promoters and media affiliates, and Oklahoma's SB 1589 and Tennessee's SB 2136 target operating, conducting, promoting or supporting the games.
Two real consequences still reach the player. Access disappears when the operator blocks the state, and a prize claim disappears with it, because a platform cannot lawfully pay a prize into a state that bans the promotion. This is not legal advice, and a player in a banned state should check their own position.
What Happens When Your State Bans Sweepstakes Casinos
Losing access is the consequence that actually arrives, so it is worth knowing how it arrives. Four things change, and they change in a fixed order.
The operator blocks new registrations from the state first, usually before the effective date rather than on it. The account stops accepting entries next, so the daily bonus and any promotion stop crediting.
A pending prize claim then has to be cleared before the cut-off, because the platform cannot pay into a state where the promotion is unlawful. Gold Coin play may or may not continue, which depends on whether the statute reaches the dual-currency platform itself or only the prize element. Betzy plans to introduce standalone Gold Coin play across restricted states in an upcoming release, separating social games from prize promotions.
No statute reviewed for this guide addresses player accounts or pending prizes directly. The operator's own terms decide those outcomes, which makes the operator's notice the document to read when a date is announced.
One action protects a player more than any other. Clear a redeemable balance before the effective date rather than after, and allow for Betzy's stated timing of 8 hours plus up to 5 business days of compliance review.
What Legal Does Not Mean: 6 Limits
Legal describes a narrower position than the word suggests. Six things do not follow from it, and each one affects what a player can expect from sweepstakes casinos.
It does not mean licensed. A lawful promotional sweepstakes carries no gaming licence and needs none, so no gaming regulator stands behind an account the way one stands behind a licensed casino.
It does not mean supervised. Consumer protection comes from general state law and the operator's published rules rather than from a gaming commission's oversight of play, payouts or complaints.
It does not mean permanent. The map moved twelve times in two years, and every operator's state list carries a change clause for that reason.
It does not mean tax-free. A redeemed prize is reportable income to the person who receives it. Betzy issues Form 1099-MISC where cumulative net prizes reach $600 in a calendar year and applies 24% backup withholding where no valid taxpayer identification number is on file.
It does not mean unrestricted. Age limits apply at 18, or 21 where a jurisdiction sets that minimum, one account per person is the rule, and excluded persons under the Terms cannot take part whatever their state allows.
It is not legal advice. This page reports what published trackers and Betzy's own Terms say; whether play is lawful for you depends on your state and your circumstances.
How to Check Your Own State Before You Play: 5 Steps
Five checks settle the question faster than any sweepstakes casino states map. Work through them in order, because step 1 answers most cases on its own.
Read the operator's restricted-territory clause first, not a third-party map. For Betzy that is Terms section 3.2 and the State Availability page.
Check the date on any state-by-state guide, including this one. A map compiled before October 2025 predates six of the twelve statutory bans.
Look for a bill number and an effective date. A state called restricted with neither is usually a regulator posture or an operator's own caution.
Check whether the restriction blocks play, the prize claim, or both.
Re-check after an address change or a long absence, because the list you registered under may have been updated since.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are sweepstakes casinos legal in the US?
In most states, yes. Sweepstakes casinos run as promotional sweepstakes under state sweepstakes law rather than as licensed gambling, because the redeemable currency reaches the player without payment. The arrangement therefore lacks the consideration that gambling law requires.
Twelve states had enacted a statutory ban by September 2026, and 11 of those bans apply now. Three more states, such as Washington and Idaho, block the model through regulator action.
Which states ban sweepstakes casinos?
Eleven states enforce a ban on sweepstakes casinos today. The list runs California (AB 831, 1 January 2026), Connecticut (SB 1235, 1 October 2025), Indiana (HB 1052, 1 July 2026), Iowa (SF 2289, 1 July 2026), Louisiana (HB 53 and HB 883, 1 August 2026) and Maine (LD 2007, 14 July 2026). It continues with Montana (SB 555, 1 October 2025), Nevada (SB 256, 1 October 2025), New Jersey (A5447, 15 August 2025), New York (S5935A, 5 December 2025) and Tennessee (SB 2136, signed 22 May 2026).
Oklahoma's SB 1589 takes effect on 1 November 2026. Washington, Idaho and Michigan block the model through regulator action rather than a dedicated statute.
Why are sweepstakes casinos legal when online casinos are not?
Sweepstakes casinos sit outside gambling law by design. Gambling requires consideration, chance and prize together, and a sweepstakes removes consideration by keeping the entry free. What remains is a prize promotion rather than a wager.
A licensed online casino takes paid stakes and needs a state gaming licence for it. Only a handful of states issue one.
Can I play at Betzy in my state?
Betzy's Terms govern the answer, not the wider sweepstakes casino states map. Residents of Washington, Idaho and Nevada may not use the platform in any capacity, and Michigan residents may play with either currency while Betzy blocks their prize claims.
For other restricted states, Betzy is preparing an upcoming feature to allow Gold Coin-only play for social entertainment without prize redemptions. Betzy may restrict additional states and may update the list at any time. Check state availability before registering, or read is Betzy legit for how the platform operates. This is not legal advice.
Is using a VPN to play from a restricted state allowed?
No. Section 13 of Betzy's Terms lists two prohibitions that cover a VPN at sweepstakes casinos: playing from a restricted territory, and using a VPN, proxy or other anonymising technology to get around geo-restrictions. Stated consequences include account suspension, forfeiture of balances and loss of pending redemptions.
The state restriction keeps the promotion lawful. Circumventing it puts both the account and any prize at risk.
Does legal mean a sweepstakes casino is regulated?
No. Lawful and licensed describe different things. A promotional sweepstakes stays lawful without a gaming licence, and no gaming regulator supervises the platform's play, payouts or complaints.
The model rests on its own structure and on general consumer-protection law instead. Licensed-casino protections, such as regulator-run dispute channels, do not apply.
Are sweeps coins legal?
Sweeps Coins are promotional sweepstakes entries, and they stay lawful wherever the promotion does. Each Redeemable Sweeps Coin carries a $1.00 USD prize value, no player can buy one at any price, and free routes deliver them.
That structure keeps the promotion outside gambling law. In the 12 states with a statutory ban, the redeemable currency is exactly what the statute names.
Did any state legalize sweepstakes casinos in 2026?
No state created a licensing regime for the model in 2026. The movement went the other way: bans took effect or were signed in six states, such as California, Indiana and Louisiana, and Oklahoma's ban carries a 1 November 2026 date.
Four further jurisdictions have bills pending. Availability elsewhere rests on general sweepstakes law rather than on any affirmative state approval.
What happens to my balance if my state bans sweepstakes casinos?
The operator's terms and the statute's own wind-down provisions decide it, so no single rule covers every case. Betzy's Terms state that the restricted-state list may change at any time as laws change.
Check the current position at state availability before a change takes effect rather than after. Contact support directly if a balance is waiting, because the platform handles those cases individually.
Can I get in trouble for playing at a sweepstakes casino?
No prosecution risk appears in the statutes reviewed for this guide. Each 2025 and 2026 ban reaches operators, suppliers, affiliates and payment processors rather than players. California's AB 831 sets a misdemeanor penalty of $1,000 to $25,000 and up to a year in jail, and it applies that to operators and supporting businesses.
Two consequences do reach a player in a banned state: the operator blocks access, and the prize claim goes with it. This is not legal advice.
Can I still play with Gold Coins in a banned state?
That depends on the statute and on the operator. Some bans reach the dual-currency platform itself, and Idaho is the clearest case where only non-redeemable play remains viable.
Betzy answers it by territory. Residents of Washington, Idaho and Nevada hold no platform access, while Michigan players cannot redeem Sweeps Coins. For other restricted states, Betzy is developing a dedicated Gold Coin-only mode for an upcoming release, allowing play through Gold Coins solely for social entertainment.
This guide describes how the sweepstakes model is structured, what published legal trackers reported in September 2026, and what Betzy's own Terms say. It is not legal advice and does not replace advice on your own circumstances. Players must be 18 or older, or 21 where a jurisdiction sets that minimum. If play stops being entertainment, the National Problem Gambling Helpline answers on 1-800-GAMBLER, by call or text, 24 hours a day.